Incidence of proximal femur fractures in older age groups in the city of Armavir
https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo13187
Abstract
Background: The increase in the incidence of proximal femoral fractures in older age groups and the lack of official statistics on their number in the country requires epidemiological studies.
Aim: To improve the quality of medical care for older patients, study the incidence of proximal femoral fractures in people aged 50 years and older in the population of the city of Armavir
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of proximal femoral fractures in individuals aged 50 years and older that occurred between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 was conducted, with active identification of all cases and verification of the diagnosis according to ICD-10th revisen.
Results: In the study population, 189 cases of low-energy proximal femoral fractures were identified, the ratio of women to men was 1.8:1.0, trochanteric fractures predominated (57% versus 42%). The overall incidence of femoral fractures was 262.6 per 100,000 population; for men — 230.5, women — 285.3. In the age range of 50–69 years, the incidence of proximal femoral fractures was higher in men, and from 70 years — in women. Compared with the data from 2008–2009, the incidence of femoral fractures in men increased by 30.9%, in women — by 2.3%.
Conclusion: The identified increase in the incidence of femoral fractures indicates the need to examine men aged 50–69 for osteoporosis during a medical examination and begin treatment, which will reduce the risk of falls and fractures.
About the Authors
S. S. Rodionova
National l Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Rodionova, MD, PhD, professor
Moscow, Priorov st., 10, 127299
Competing Interests:
none
P. S. Seropolov
National l Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov; Armavir City Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Petr S. Seropolov
Moscow
Armavir
Competing Interests:
none
E. I. Solod
National l Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Eduard I. Solod, MD, PhD, professor
Moscow
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Materials of the state statistical reporting of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (In Russ.) URL: https://mednet.ru/miac/meditsinskaya-statistika (дата обращения: 27.03.2021)
2. Maffulli N, Aicale R. Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(10):1314. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101314
3. Disproportionately increased incidence of proximal femoral fractures in a level one trauma center : Epidemiological analysis from 2016 to 2022. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024;127(3):221-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-023-01359-0
4. Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G, Norton N, Halbout P, et al. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y
5. Mihajlov EE, Benevolenskaya LI. Epidemiologiya osteoporoza i perelomov. Rukovodstvo po osteoporozu. Pod red. L.I. Benevolenskoj. — M.: BINOM, laboratoriya znanij, 2003. — S. 10-5. (In Russ.)
6. Lesnyak OM, Lebedev AK, Galstyan R, et al. Epidemiologiya perelomov proksimal’nogo otdela bedrennoy kosti v stranakh regiona po rezul’tatam mnogotsentrovogo epidemiologicheskogo issledovaniya EVA. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2016;19(2):16-17. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo2016216-17
7. Ershova OB, Belova KYu, Ganert OA, Romanova MA, Sinicyna OS. Iskhod osteoporoticheskogo pereloma proksimal’nogo otdela bedra. Klinicheskaya gerontologiya. 2014;20(3-4):3-8 (In Russ.).
8. Lesnyak O, Ershova O, Belova K, et al. Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7(1-2):67-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0082-3
9. Evstigneeva LP, Fominyh MI, Gladkova EN, Lesnyak OM. Epidemiologiya perelomov v Sverdlovskoj oblasti u lic starshe trudosposobnogo vozrasta po dannym otchetnyh form v sravnenii s raschetnymi pokazatelyami. [Tezisy doklada. RAOP, 9 kongress: 4-7 sentyabrya 2024 g. (In Russ.)
10. Romanov GN, Chernyanin IYu, Rudenko EV, Lesnyak OM, Zakroeva AG. Epidemiologiya perelomov proksimal’nogo otdela bedrennoj kosti v Respublike Belarus’. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im N.N. Priorova. 2017;3:32-36 (In Russ.).
11. Trincado RM, Mori MAK, Fernandes LS, Perlaky TA, Hungria JOS. Epidemiology of proximal femur fracture in older adults in a Philanthropical Hospital in SÃO PAULO. Acta Ortop Bras. 2022;30(6):e255963. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220223006e255963
12. Longo UG, Viganò M, de Girolamo L, Banfi G, Salvatore G, Denaro V. Epidemiology and Management of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Italy between 2001 and 2016 in Older Adults: Analysis of the National Discharge Registry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:16985. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416985
13. Lau EM, Lee JK, Suriwongpaisal P, et al. The incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries; the Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS). Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:239–43
14. Bäcker HC, Wu CH, Maniglio M, Wittekindt S, Hardt S, Perka C. Epidemiology of proximal femoral fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;12(1):161-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.001
15. Yano S, Matsuura Y, Hagiwara S, Nakamura J, Kawarai Y, et al. Determinants of fracture type in the proximal femur: Biomechanical study of fresh frozen cadavers and finite element models. Bone. 2022;158:116352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2022.116352
16. Viganò M, Pennestrì F, Listorti E, Banfi G. Proximal hip fractures in 71,920 elderly patients: incidence, epidemiology, mortality and costs from a retrospective observational study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1963. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16776-4
17. Stevens JA, Rudd RA. The impact of decreasing US hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24№10):2725–2728. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2375-9
18. Kim BS, Lim JY, Ha YC. Recent Epidemiology of Hip Fractures in South Korea. Hip Pelvis. 2020;32(3):119-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2020.32.3.119
19. Lesnyak OM, Yershova OB, Belova KYu, Gladkova EN, Sinitsyna OS, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in the Russian Federation and the Russian model of FRAX. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2014;17(3):3-8. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo201433-8
20. Haleem S, Choudri MJ, Kainth GS, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: Trends and geographical variations over the last SIXTY years. Injury. 2023;54(2):620-629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.008
21. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H. Continuously declining incidence of hip fracture in Finland: Analysis of nationwide database in 1970-2016. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;77:64-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.008
22. Hong G, Zhong H, Illescas A, Reisinger L, Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Liu J, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in hip fracture surgery in the United States from 2016 to 2021: patient characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(5):955-964. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.022
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Рисунок 1. Распределение абсолютного числа ППОБК по полу в разных возрастных группах. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(293KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Rodionova S.S., Seropolov P.S., Solod E.I. Incidence of proximal femur fractures in older age groups in the city of Armavir. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2025;28(1):13-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo13187
Views:
192
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Email this article 
