NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF BONE QUALITY IN CLINICAL ROUTINE

1. Seeman E. et al. Bone Quality - The Material and Structural. Basis of Bone Strength and Fragility. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2250-61).

2. Johnnell O et al. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1726-33

3. Hans D, et al. Bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone density: the Manitoba study. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Nov;26(11):2762-9. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.499. PMID: 21887701

4. Judex S, et al. Combining high-resolution micro-computed tomography with material composition to define the quality of bone tissue. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2003 Jun;1(1):11-9. Review. PMID: 16036060

5. Diez-Perez A et al. Microindentation for in vivo measurement of bone tissue mechanical properties in humans. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Aug;25(8):1877-85. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.73. PMID: 20200991

6. Link TM. Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging. Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):3-17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110462. Review. PMID: 22438439

7. Engelke K, et al. Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Sep;11(3):246-55. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0147-2. Review. PMID: 23712690.

8. Engelke K et al. Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) ofthe Hip in the Management of Osteoporosis inAdults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part I. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):338-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.012. PMID: 26277851

9. Zysset P et al. Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis of the Hip and Spine in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part II. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):359-92. doi: 10.1016/jjocd.2015.06.011. PMID: 26277852

10. Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Shousboe JT. Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):393-407. doi: 10.1016/j. jocd.2015.06.010. PMID: 26277853

11. Kulak CA et al. Bone histomorphometry: a concise review for endocrinologists and clinicians. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010 Mar;54(2):87-98. Review. PMID: 20485895

12. Broy SB et al. Fracture Risk Prediction by Non-BMD DXA Measures: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions Part 1: Hip Geometry. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):287-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.005. PMID: 26277848

13. Shepherd JA et al. Executive Summary of the 2015 ISCD Position Development Conference on Advanced Measures From DXA and QCT: Fracture Prediction Beyond BMD. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):274-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.013. PMID: 26277847

14. Boehm HF et al. Differentiation between post-menopausal women with and without hip fractures: enhanced evaluation of clinical DXA by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in the scan images. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 779-787.

15. Langton CM et al. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 2009; 31: 668-672.

16. Yang L et al. Prediction of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA Scans in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Dec;29(12):2594-600. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2291. PMID: 24898426

17. Hans D et al. Correlations between trabecular bone score, measured using anteroposterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry acquisition, and 3-dimensional parameters of bone microarchitecture: an experimental study on human cadaver vertebrae. J Clin Densitom 2011;14:302-12.

18. Roux JP et al.The predictive value of trabecular bone score (TBS) on whole lumbar vertebrae mechanics: an ex vivo study. Osteoporos Int 2013;24:2455-60.

19. Muschitz C et al. TBS reflects trabecular microarchitecture in premenopausal women and men with idiopathic osteoporosis and low-traumatic fractures. Bone 2015;79:259-66.

20. Winzenrieth R et al. Three-dimensional (3D) microarchitecture correlations with 2D projection image gray-level variations assessed by trabecular bone score using high-resolution computed tomographic acquisitions: effects of resolution and noise. J Clin Densitom 2013;16:287-96.

21. Silva BC et al. Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J Bone Miner Res 2014;29:518-30.

22. Harvey NC et al. Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice. Bone. 2015; May 16. [Epub ahead of print].

23. Silva BC et al. Fracture Risk Prediction by Non-BMD DXA Measures: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions Part 2: Trabecular Bone Score. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep; 18(3): 309-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.008.

24. McCloskey EV et al. Adjusting fracture probability by trabecular bone score. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Jun;96(6): 500-9. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-9980-x. Epub 2015 Mar 22. PMID: 25796374

25. McCloskey EV et al. A meta-analysis of trabecular bone score in fracture risk prediction and its relationship to FRAX. J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Oct 24. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2734. [Epub ahead of print]

26. Ulivieri FM et al. Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis. Endocrine. 2014.Nov;47(2):435-48. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0280-4. Epub 2014 May 23. Review. PMID: 24853880