Factors influencing bone mineral density in postpartum women
Abstract
Background: Osteopenia is a common condition. Therefore, identification of groups for prevention of osteoporosis and restoration of bone mineral density (BMD) remains relevant.
Aim: to assess the factors contributing to development of osteopenia in puerperas.
Methods: prospective cross-sectional study. We examined 112 patients aged 20-35, 3-5 days after delivery. To assess possible factors for BMD decrease, we analyzed medical history, lifestyle, nutrition, anthropometric data, obstetric and gynecological history, and pregnancy course. We also assessed serum levels of 25-hydroxycalciferol (25-OH-D) and PTH. BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray osteodensitometry. We considered Z-score from -1 to -2.5SD as osteopenia, below -2.5 SD-as osteoporosis.
Results: based on Z-score values, two groups were formed: 1 (n=70) - puerperas with osteopenia, 2 (n=42) - puerperas with normal BMD. In the first group, osteopenia in the distal radius was observed in 48%, in the lumbar spine in 16% and in the proximal femur in 36%. Influence of the following possible factors in group 1 was established: BMI in 15-20 years ≤ 18 kg/m2 (p<0.013), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (p<0.018), 25-OH-D less than 25 ng / ml (p < 0.0018), calcium intake less than 800 mg/day (p<0.041). Menstrual disorders (p<0.052) and preeclapsia (p < 0.042) affected lumbar spine BMD. In group 1, vitamin D deficiency was detected in 82% of women, 18% showed vitamin D insufficiency; in group 2, vitamin D deficiency was found in 16%, deficiency in 70%, in 14% vitamin D was normal. In women with a combination of factors such as BMI≤ 18 kg/m; calcium intake lower than 800 mg/day, menstrual cycle disorders, vitamin D deficiency - osteopenia in the distal radius occured 11 times more often (OR=11,47059; CI 95%=[4,0326; 32,627]).
Conclusion: most significant impact on BMD decrease in puerperas can be expected if patient has the following risk factors: BMI≤18 kg/m2; 25-OH- D<25 ng/ml ; nutrition with calcium intake <800 mg per day, preeclampsia. Combination of these factors may increase the risk of osteopenia in the distal radius.
About the Authors
Tatiana V. NovikovaAlmazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Lubov V. Kuznetsova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
MD, PhD
Natalia Yu. Yakovleva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
Irina E. Zazerskaya
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation
MD, PhD
References
1. Singh R, Gupta S, Awasthi A. Differential effect of predictors of bone mineral density and hip geometry in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2015;10(1). doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0246-z.
2. Wei W, Shary JR, Garrett-Mayer E, et al. Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2017;106(6):1422-1430. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.140459.
3. Møller UK, við Streym S, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study. Osteoporos. Int. 2011;23(4):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1654-6.
4. El Maghraoui A, Do Santos Zounon AA, Jroundi I, et al. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. Osteoporos. Int. 2005;16(12):1742-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2.
5. Namgung R, Tsang RC. Bone in the pregnant mother and newborn at birth. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2003;333(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00025-6.
6. Di Gregorio S, Danilowicz K, Rubin Z, Mautalen C. Osteoporosis with vertebral fractures associated with pregnancy and lactation. Nutrition. 2000;16(11-12):1052-1055. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00430-5.
7. Kovacs CS, Kronenberg HM. Maternal-Fetal Calcium and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Puerperium, and Lactation1. Endocr. Rev. 1997;18(6):832-872. doi: 10.1210/edrv.18.6.0319.
8. Yun KY, Han SE, Kim SC, et al. Pregnancy-related osteoporosis and spinal fractures. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2017;60(1):133. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.1.133.
9. Sidor P, Glabska D, Wlodarek D. Analysis of the dietary factors contributing to the future osteoporosis risk in young Polish women. Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2016;67(3):279-285.
10. Судаков Д.С. Оценка кальций-фосфорного обмена и ремоделирования костной ткани у женщин при физиологической беременности: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. —Санкт-Петербург; 2011. [Sudakov DS. Otsenka kal'tsiy-fosfornogo obmena i remodelirovaniya kostnoy tkani u zhenshchin pri fiziologicheskoy beremennosti. [dissertation] Saint Petersburg; 2011. (in Russ)].
11. Шишкова В.Н. Ожирение и остеопороз // Остеопороз и остеопатии. - 2011. - Т. 14. - №1. - C. 21-26. [Shishkova VN, Shishkova VN. Obesity and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis and bone diseases. 2011;14(1):21-26. (in Russ).] doi: 10.14341/osteo2011121-26.
12. Wiksten-Almströmer M, Hirschberg AL, Hagenfeldt K. Prospective follow-up of menstrual disorders in adolescence and prognostic factors. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2008;87(11):1162-1168. doi: 10.1080/00016340802478166.
13. Balasuriya CND, Evensen KAI, Mosti MP, et al. Peak Bone Mass and Bone Microarchitecture in Adults Born With Low Birth Weight Preterm or at Term: A Cohort Study. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 2017;102(7):2491-2500. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3827.
14. Laskey MA, Price RI, Khoo BCC, Prentice A. Proximal femur structural geometry changes during and following lactation. Bone. 2011;48(4):755-759. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.016.
15. Meczekalski B, Katulski K, Czyzyk A, et al. Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea and its influence on women’s health. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2014;37(11):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s40618-014-0169-3.
16. Ward KA, Adams JE, Mughal MZ. Bone status during adolescence, pregnancy and lactation. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005;17(4):435-439. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000175365.65835.ad.
17. Gajic-Veljanoski O, Papaioannou A, Kennedy C, et al. Osteoporotic fractures and obesity affect frailty progression: a longitudinal analysis of the Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1). doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0692-0.
18. Chin K-Y, Low N, Dewiputri W, Ima-Nirwanaa S. Factors Associated with Bone Health in Malaysian Middle-Aged and Elderly Women Assessed via Quantitative Ultrasound. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health. 2017;14(7):736. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070736.
19. El Maghraoui A, Guerboub AA, Mounach A, et al. Body mass index and gynecological factors as determinants of bone mass in healthy Moroccan women. Maturitas. 2007;56(4):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.10.004.
Supplementary files
|
1. Fig. 1. Distribution of IPC in observation groups. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(117KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. Fig. 2. The histogram of the discriminant function characterizes the relative risk of osteopenia. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(140KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Novikova T.V., Kuznetsova L.V., Yakovleva N.Yu., Zazerskaya I.E. Factors influencing bone mineral density in postpartum women. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2018;21(1):10-16. (In Russ.)