Consensus of experts of the Russian Osteoporosis Association on the use of trabecular bone index in clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo13227
Abstract
Traditionally, the assessment of fracture risk is based on measuring bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (densitometry). However, more than half of cases of low-energy fractures occur in patients with osteopenia or even normal BMD. The reason is that in addition to the bone mass, its microarchitecture is also important, which is not evaluated by standard densitometry. The trabecular bone score is a non-invasive, indirectly obtained indicator that characterizes the condition of trabecular bone tissue. It is determined by textural analysis of the image obtained during standard DXA of the lumbar spine in a direct projection. High values correspond to a well-organized, robust trabecular bone structure, while low values indicate a pronounced degradation of the microarchitecture. The trabecular bone score serves as an independent predictor of a decrease in bone strength, and combined with bone mineral density, it allows to more accurately predict fracture risk than each of these values separately. The score makes it possible to clarify the risk of both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and in clinical practice it is used as an additional parameter in assessing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures.
Based on the literature data and their own experience, the experts of the Russian Association on Osteoporosis have formulated recommendations on the use of the trabecular bone score in clinical practice to more accurately determine the individual risk of fracture within the framework of personalized medicine.
About the Authors
O. M. LesnyakRussian Federation
Olga M. Lesnyak, Professor
30, B. Pod’yacheskaya, St. Petersburg 190068
Zh. E. Belaya
Russian Federation
Zhanna E. Belaya, MD, PhD
Moscow
K. Yu. Belova
Russian Federation
Kseniia Y. Belova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor
Yaroslavl
S. Yu. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
Sergey Yu. Kuznetsov, MD, PhD
Moscow
I. A. Skripnikova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Skripnikova, MD, PhD, Dr. habil.
Moscow
N. V. Toroptsova
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Toroptsova, MD, Dr Sci (Med.)
Moscow
References
1. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1254-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254
2. Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Watts JJ, Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Seeman E. Half the burden of fragility fractures in the community occur in women without osteoporosis. When is fracture prevention cost-effective? Bone. 2006 May;38(5):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.004
3. Silva BC, Leslie WD, Resch H, Lamy O, Lesnyak O, Binkley N, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Bilezikian JP. Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Mar;29(3):518-30. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2176. Erratum in: J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Nov;32(11):2319. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3218].
4. Shuhart C, Cheung A, Gill R, Gani L, Goel H, Szalat A. Executive Summary of the 2023 Adult Position Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: DXA Reporting, Follow-up BMD Testing and Trabecular Bone Score Application and Reporting. J Clin Densitom. 2024 Jan-Mar;27(1):101435. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101435]. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Erratum in: J Clin Densitom. 2025 Jan-Mar;28(1):101548. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101548
5. McCloskey EV, Odén A, Harvey NC, Leslie WD, Hans D, Johansson H, Barkmann R, Boutroy S, Brown J, Chapurlat R, Elders PJM, Fujita Y, Glüer CC, Goltzman D, Iki M, Karlsson M, Kindmark A, Kotowicz M, Kurumatani N, Kwok T, Lamy O, Leung J, Lippuner K, Ljunggren Ö, Lorentzon M, Mellström D, Merlijn T, Oei L, Ohlsson C, Pasco JA, Rivadeneira F, Rosengren B, Sornay-Rendu E, Szulc P, Tamaki J, Kanis JA. A Meta-Analysis of Trabecular Bone Score in Fracture Risk Prediction and Its Relationship to FRAX. J Bone Miner Res. 2016 May;31(5):940-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2734
6. Binkley N, Krueger D, Leslie WD. Accurate Weight and Height Measurement is Essential for Correct Trabecular Bone Score Determination. J Clin Densitom. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):52-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 25. PMID: 36470791
7. Goel H, Binkley N, Hans D, Leslie WD. Fracture risk gradient assessed by categories of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score: the Manitoba BMD Registry. Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 22;18(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01284-0. PMID: 37213026
8. Shevroja E, Reginster JY, Lamy O, Al-Daghri N, Chandran M, Demoux-Baiada AL, Kohlmeier L, Lecart MP, Messina D, Camargos BM, Payer J, Tuzun S, Veronese N, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Harvey NC. Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging. Osteoporos Int. 2023 Sep;34(9):1501-1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06817-4
9. Leslie WD, Hans D, Silva BC. Fracture Prediction from Trabecular Bone Score is Unaffected by Anti-Resorptive Treatment: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Densitom. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.01.001
10. Belaya ZE, Hans D, Rozhinskaya LY, Dragunova NV, Sasonova NI, Solodovnikov AG, Tsoriev TT, Dzeranova LK, Melnichenko GA, Dedov II. The risk factors for fractures and trabecular bone-score value in patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:44. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0244-1.
11. Сlinical Guidelines «Оsteoporosis» https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/87_5
12. Belaya Z, Rozhinskaya L, Dedov I, Drapkina O, Fadeev V, Golounina O, Lesnyak O, Mamedova E, Melnichenko G, Petraikin A, Rodionova S, Skripnikova I, Tkacheva O, Toroptsova N, Yureneva S, Kanis JA. A summary of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2023 Mar;34(3):429-447. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06667-6.
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Рисунок 1. Сравнение здоровой трабекулярной кости (вверху) и деградированной трабекулярной кости при остеопорозе (внизу). Здоровая кость имеет плотную, хорошо организованную трабекулярную структуру, что отражается в высоком значении трабекулярного костного индекса (ТКИ) (пример — 1,360). При остеопорозе трабекулы истончены и разрежены, структура нарушена, и расчетный TКИ снижается (пример — 1,102). Данные получены на основе анализа DXA-изображений поясничных позвонков L1–L4 [по Silva et al. 2014]. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(929KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
2. Рисунок 2. Использование трабекулярного костного индекса для коррекции риска перелома по минеральной плотности костной ткани. | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(321KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Lesnyak O.M., Belaya Zh.E., Belova K.Yu., Kuznetsov S.Yu., Skripnikova I.A., Toroptsova N.V. Consensus of experts of the Russian Osteoporosis Association on the use of trabecular bone index in clinical practice. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2026;29(1):45-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo13227
JATS XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).































